2009-10-26
Readings for session six
Détournement as Negation and Prelude (1959) http://www.bopsecrets.org/SI/3.detourn.htm
Comments on the Society of the Spectacle (1988) http://www.notbored.org/commentaires.html
joyce on facts
Thus the unfacts, did we possess them, are too imprecisely few to warrant our certitude, the evidencegivers by legpoll too untrustworthily irreperible where his adjugers are semmingly freak threes but his judicandees plainly minus two. Nevertheless Madam's Toshowus waxes largely more lifeliked (entrance, one kudos; exits, free) and our notional gullery is now completely complacent, an exegious monument, aerily perennious.
So much going on here: deed-poll becomes leg-pull, Horace's line Exegi monumentum aere perennius ('I have erected a monument more lasting than bronze') becomes a gutted shell (another crypt?). Earlier in the book we're told:
'in this scherzarade of one's thousand one nightiness that sword of certainty which would indentifide the body never falls'
notice the riff on Scheherazade: in lieu of pure fact/truth, we have endless narrative, at stake in which is a woman's life: if she stops narrating, she gets the chop!
2009-10-25
2009-10-24
2009-10-22
2009-10-19
It was like a scene from a movie!
—Jean Baudrillard, Simulacra & Simulation (Sheila Faria Glaser, trans.)
2009-10-14
Reading and Catastrophe
Here's an article on reading and catastrophe I found in the latest issue of Geist, a Canadian literary magazine. A bit sentimental but good read.
Eurydice, Bracha Ettinger
etching
Also, Helen mentioned an artist who photocopies her parents: perhaps an image or two, or a link...?
2009-10-12
Group 1's Victory Picture
Hello everyone.
oh for crying out loud
does someone know how to make this into a hyperlink?
double take
'scuse the plug, but here's a trailer for the film by Johan Grimonprez for which I wrote the story. It's all about the Cold War and catastrophe. It premieres in London next week:
Thu 15 Oct | 16:15 | NFT1
Fri 16 Oct | 20:30 | NFT2 (followed by Q&A with the producer)
Mon 19 Oct | 16:30 | ICA 1 (followed by Q&A with the director)
Johan's other film, Dial H-I-S-T-O-R-Y, is perhaps even more relevant to our subject: full of airline hijack footage. It won the Documenta Prize a decade ago.
2009-10-11
Old Man Atom
2009-10-10
Hiroshima Research..
we left our bibliography and a download of our PPT at www.shainhouse.com/hiroshima.
and here's it copied/pasted:
- Nick, Shain, Jacob and Kai.
Hiroshima
Here is a list of all the materials we found/sourced for the presentation.
Link to PPT –> http://docs.google.com/present/view?id=dhtr4vvd_231g554gjck
- Shain, Kai, Nick, Jacob (and Helen - the mindmapess).
Course Materials:
J.G.Ballard, Crash, London, 1973
Freud, Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis, Lecture 17 (The Sense of Symptoms) and Lecture 18 (Fixation to Traumas-The Unconscious). (296-326, i.e. 30 pages in the Penguin Complete Freud, Vol. 1, Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis)
Further Reading on Crash:
www.jgballard.com
www.ballardian.com
Further Explanation of Freud:
http://www.cla.purdue.edu/English/theory/psychoanalysis/freud5.html
Barefoot Gen, The Atomic Bomb and I:
http://www.japanfocus.org/-Nakazawa-Keiji/2638
Hiroshima and the Power of Pictures: Bulletin of Atomic Scientists:
http://www.thebulletin.org/web-edition/columnists/hugh-gusterson/hiroshima-and-the-power-of-pictures
Hiroshima Picture Gallery:
http://fogonazos.blogspot.com/2007/02/hiroshima-pictures-they-didnt-want-us_05.html
Ken Domon Photo Archive / Essay:
http://japan-photo.info/blog/tag/ken-domon/
and book: http://www.bekkoame.ne.jp/ro/gj13019/gjlivres/livres/livre_r180.htm
or: http://www.bekkoame.ne.jp/ro/gj13019/gjlivres/livres/livre_r180.htm
Japanese Landscape:
http://home.nps.gov/pwr/customcf/apps/ww2ip/assets/images/event/detail/main_1945hiroshima.jpg
John Hersey’s Hiroshima:
http://www.amazon.com/Hiroshima-John-Hersey/dp/0679721037
The Hiroshima Panels (Memorials) - 1950-82
http://www.aya.or.jp/~marukimsn/english/INTRODUCTION.htm
http://www.japanfocus.org/data/nanjing-1975marukis.JPG
http://www.aya.or.jp/~marukimsn/english/genbakuE.htm
The Remembering of Hiroshima as Trauma in Post-War Japan:
http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/0/9/4/6/3/p94639_index.html
Routine Investigations (slide 5)
http://routineinvestigations.blogspot.com/2008_06_01_archive.html
Atomic Archive / Charts (from slide 2):
http://www.atomicarchive.com/Maps/HiroshimaMap.shtml
The Music We Played: Krzysztof Penderecki
‘Threnody To the Victims of Hiroshima’ (1960)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfBVYhyXU8o
Google Earth Images / Modern Hiroshima:
On Blanchot's the Outside
The cool thing is that the Outside is so infinitely exterior that it ‘tunnels to the other side’ and becomes infinitely interior (hence, its so-called rustling intimacy). Being exterior even to exteriority itself, the Outside is, in a sense, neutral with respect to in versus out, here versus beyond, and immanence versus transcendence. We may crudely say that the Outside is what is both outside and at the ‘heart’ of language, what is both within and without. So the spatiality goes haywire here and becomes less rigid or less geometric, at least in the Euclidean sense.
Moreover, this non-relation, this absolute separation from everything, makes the relation with the Outside an infinite relation, the most ‘authentic’ of relations. The event of this relation might be worthy of being called an Event or even, in some cases, a Catastrophe or a Disaster.
Another crude way to introduce the Outside is by comparing it to the ‘primal Khaos’ of the ancient Greeks: the original disorder or background noise from which everything bubbles forth or ‘froths’ out.
“Events are the foam of things, but what I am interested in is the sea,” writes Paul Valery. And we could say that almost every philosopher –I am over-generalizing, I know – has devised his/her own vocabulary to help speak of this first ‘sea’: negativity in the dialectic (for Hegel); Dionysian energy (for Nietzsche); Sein & then Earth (for Heidegger); God (for those who believe); the Unconscious & the Id (Sigmund); il y a & the Other (Levinas); the Dao (Daoists); Dan (certain Asian philosophies); transgression (Bataille); vitality & the virtual (Deleuze); ur-noise (Serres); turbulent nonlinearity (chaos theorists); the generic set (Badiou); bla bla bla.
Blanchot uses other terms as well, like ‘the Other Night’, ‘the Obscure’, ‘the Unknown’ and ‘the Neutral’. He came to talk a lot about the Outside in an earlier book, ‘The Space of Literature’. The most famous secondary literature on this topic is Foucault’s ‘Maurice Blanchot & the Thought from the Outside’. There’s also the second section to Deleuze’s book on Foucault, which is, in a way, Deleuze’s rather idiosyncratic reading of Foucault’s rather idiosyncratic reading of Blanchot.
2009-10-09
levinas
‘I am not merely the origin of myself, but I am disturbed by the Other. Not judged by the Other, but condemned without being able to speak, persecuted. But we have shown that it is necessary to go further: to be substitutable for the persecutor; whence the idea of responsibility preceding freedom.’
and:
‘Modern antihumanism, which denies the primacy that the human person, a free end in itself, has for the signification of being, is true over and above the reasons it gives itself. It makes a place for subjectivity positing itself in abnegation, in sacrifice, and in substitution. Its great intuition is to have abandoned the idea of person as an end in itself. The Other (Autrui) is the end, and me, I am a hostage.’
re this 'hostage' idea:
‘It is through the condition of being a hostage that there can be pity, compassion, pardon and proximity in the world’
and yet, at the same time:
‘the past of the Other must never have been present.’
Thinking of 'Hiroshima mon Amour' again: it is precisely because of all the substitutions and ruptures and eruptions (of one subject into another, one unnamed past into the present and so on) that a set of ethical relations are established. I think it's a beautiful film for this reason - and many others...
2009-10-08
Outside
How do you understand Blanchot's use of the term "outside"?
"A tear of petrol is in your eye / As the handbrake penetrates your thigh"
Cai Guo-Qiang, Memory, Energy Transferral and Catastrophe
Some thoughts
Hi everyone. Firstly to all the non-Brits who thought last week’s weather was surprisingly nice: welcome to the English autumn.
A couple of points. Firstly I was considering the relation of a word to the concept it represents and the extent to which we need to think about the word ‘catastrophe’. I thought this consideration is perhaps necessary so that catastrophe doesn’t simply become whatever our committee wants it to be. (Would that be a problem? I don’t know). Is it useful for us to anchor our consideration of 'catastrophe' in language? Would this be restrictive / prescriptive or an interesting way of generating new perspectives on the concept?
The Greek root of ‘catastrophe’ (from the OED) contains many of the elements we discussed last week but, it seems to me, without the violent or negative connotations:
[a. Gr. overturning, sudden turn, conclusion, f. to overturn, etc., f. down + to turn.]
The fuller OED definition of ‘catastrophe’, part of which is at the top of the Catastrophe course webpage, emphasises more the ideas of Finality, Negativity, Suddenness, Revolution, Violence. Perhaps the usage of the word has gained this more negative slant over time - is this something we should consider? I thought particularly interesting is the co-existence of ‘finality’ and ‘revolution’, which to some extent seem to me to be in opposition. A ‘Blanchotian’ paradox perhaps.
I also turned the definition into a ‘wordle’ - a very nice (if useless) tool that can be found here. I did edit the text to get rid of a huge skew toward the word ‘catastrophe’ and terms such as I, II, III, etc.
Secondly, I’m wary of sounding unsophisticated here but wanted to propose the idea that [cliché alert] media sensationalism and “round-the-clock coverage” of events desensitise both the public and the media themselves to the possibility of catastrophe. We are told that everything is newsworthy (if not catastrophic): does this lead to a situation where nothing is? I suppose this theory hinges on the question of whether catastrophe as an occurrence in the world is relative or necessarily absolute. Anyway, something to think about I hope. Feel free to criticise - everybody seems to be too polite to comment on anybody else on the blog so far!
Finally, for your enjoyment...
Barney
2009-10-06
Memorandum
2009-10-05
Catastrophe as Exception
Super-Frog Saves Tokyo and Barefoot Gen
http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/gallery/2009/sep/28/gustav-metzger-serpentine
Tom McC
2009-10-04
La Soufrière
Werner Herzog's La Soufrière (1977) , subtitled, "waiting for an unavoidable catastrophe" (that never happened) is a perfect example of the non-representability of catastrophe - in his case because it doesn't occur. Herzog, never happier than when he does the voiceover of assorted marginalised, doomed characters, produced this elegiac and hopelessly romantic documentary attempting to capture the threatened cataclysmic explosion of volcano and ended up arguing that the real catastrophe was that the catastrophe he was looking for, and which would have led to his death, never happened.
two points
catastrophe is often associated with the new -- as a specific manifestation of novelty -- not only because a catastrophe has to be, to a certain extent, a surprise, a Bang, a deus ex machina, a rupture from the Outside, but also because it often creates the conditions for the new, for rebirth, etc -- as in the example discussed in the class about the destruction of a city in an earthquake, fire, tsunami etc. enabling for new buildings to be built, bla bla bla.
so, to a certain extent, this 'novelty' aspect about catastrophe is opposed to repetition, to the old.
but there's this cool, well-known & almost cliche idea -- probably popularized by Deleuze's Difference et Repetition -- although it probably comes from Nietzsche's infinite return (Blanchot also talks about it in the eternal return) -- that repetition and the new (i.e. difference) are both two sides of the same coin -- that they manifest or effectuate themselves through each other. of course, psychoanalysis talks about this as well.
#catastrophe theory
i also forgot about 'catastrophe theory', a subfield in mathematics that used to be quite popular several decades ago -- although the field is pretty much dead now and is no longer an active topic in research among mathematicians.
i remembered about catastrophe theory, this because the mathematician Rene Thom, the big dick in this field, appears in the reading list.
i don't have much background in the topic, but i remember thom's main result being the geometric classification of catastrophes in 2 dimensions (or was it 3?). we normally associate the catastrophe, the disaster & the event with the unsayable and the unstructurable. but it turns out, using thom's result, that the kinds of catastrophes is actually finite. this, of course, relates to chaos theory bla bla bla.
i guess the study of catastrophes in mathematics & science has been replaced with the more general study of geometrical singularities -- black holes, cusp moments, hironaka's theorem about the 'resolution of singularities', bla bla bla.
but there's also the question of in what sense can catastrophes be understood to exist in space & time, and whether a geometric & algebraic approach is justifiable and, if yes, what is the truth-status of such articulations.
Can I do this?
reflections on the first session
i've been thinking about the theme claire brought up about repetition. the postminimalist artist eva hesse said 'endless repetition can be considered erotic,' in this way i think referring to eroticism as 'play,'with a set of variables that are changed and new. this also follows claire's points about how disaster allows us to reconceptualize our situations and make the new- for example the city planner recreating lisbon, or contemporary reconstructions (lets remember that actually while they were around NYers hated the twin towers, famously an ugly blot on the skyline- and though the subsequent quest for a 9-11 memorial has been basically fruitless, it has for better or worse symbolized a concept of rethinking the city, a sort of regeneration, as when forest fires create an area of emptiness that are actually crucial for the long term health of forests). Or as harry lime says in the third man, ''in Italy for 30 years under the Borgias they had warfare, terror, murder, and bloodshed, but they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, and the Renaissance. In Switzerland they had brotherly love - they had 500 years of democracy and peace, and what did that produce? The cuckoo clock.'' basically this simplistic idea is at the core of many more specific and complicated works- i'm thinking of 'radical reconstruction,' by lebbeus woods, which gives specific situations (sarajevo) and how destruction allowed for subsequent modification to the city. (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Radical-Reconstruction-Lebbeus-Woods/dp/1568982860)
so if repetition is play, a constant alteration of a cultural continuum, then is the catastrophe itself repetitive?
Even though it seems bracing and unprecedented, we are used to our cities being destroyed- to the extent that most major metropoli have many imagined catastrophes (those imagined for los angeles, for example, written about in 'the ecology of fear' by mike davis; but paris has banlieue 13, new york has escape from new york (not to mention actually dozens of movies that imagine a destroyed new york, etc)
i got a sense from what claire was saying about how maybe, catastrophe can offer a relief from monotony, even if terrifying. it can offer us central narratives to build around perhaps?
well, thats a lot of details that seem disorderly. but I guess the real question is, is disaster a catalyst for modernism, and actually is modernism a catastrophe?
modernity has
-destroyed dialects, family links, traditional ways of life, religious practices, etc
I guess i'm trying mainly to work my mind around the idea of catastrophe as repetition- even though it seems that unprecedentedness and shock is built into the concept, it does seem that perhaps it is repetitious or serial in nature.
disaster of the ordinary
Paul's mention of "poles of Infamy" and his "quiet" examples made me begin to muse about the scale and amplitude of catastrophe.
This article and video made think about the catastrophe of the everyday, the ordinary. While this class traces large scale disasters-known and reported, or as Marko pointed out- the unreported, large trees crashing in the woods. We are bombarded, usually via "the human interest story" with the always unfolding disaster of just getting out of bed. That cup of coffee is carcinogenic, that burger is blighted, the very dust in the corner of out rooms-quite unsettled, poisons us one-by-one.
2009-10-03
Identifying the Intricate (and Two Stories!)
2009-10-02
The Third Catastrophe Committee is in session
Session 2: Nick, Shain, Alex D, Helen. Mind-mapper: Kai
Session 3: Robert, Marc, Paul, Alex M. Mind-mapper: tbc
Session 4: Joey, Christopher, Anna, Barney. Mind-mapper: Ross
Session 5: Walter, Tina, Alice, Dagmara. Mind-mapper: tbc
Session 6: Daniel, Sami, Jacob, Burhanuddin. Mind-mapper: Thomas
Keeper of the Map: Clare Heath
Helen Stokes is the mind map and session broker. If anyone wants to change the session they're working on, Helen will broker any mutually agreed swaps.
Looking forward to your posts.
Marko